Discussion about this post

User's avatar
True Faith's avatar

A personal comment (rather than editorial one) and one I've made before here. The polarisation of views among fans is unfortunate, even in a civilised forum like this, and although I'm sure the sentiment isn't aimed at everyone who has criticism to make of Eddie (as the article makes clear), the word "wankers" isn't really helpful in avoiding that polarisation.

Currently, every result on the pitch seems to become ammunition in a debate that makes massive generalisations about everyone on the other side.

Such is the way of the world these days, I suppose. I realise I'm being very po-faced here, but I think it's important!

neville dent's avatar

Fabulous Steve, well said. What gets me about the wankers, as you so elegantly named them (and I'm fully with you on that), is their main reason for wanting to replace Eddie Howe, is this mythical next level reason, I say mythical, because I am yet to see anyone explain what this next level they believe NUFC should be attaining is! But whatever it is, they believe Eddie can't take them there. I half blame the CEO for giving them this mad 5 year plan to challenge for everything, without explaing how exactly we realistically do this with the finacial constraints in place, and these constraints seem to have been forgotten about by all the wankers.

71 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?